Next In Web3

Bitcoin Under Trump vs Biden: Who Helped Crypto More?

Table of Contents

Bitcoin under Trump

Politics and crypto make for strange bedfellows, especially when dissecting Bitcoin under Trump versus the Biden era. Trump earned the nickname “America’s first crypto president” with promises to turn the US into the crypto capital of the world, while Biden’s team faced accusations of waging war on digital assets. But let’s cut through the rhetoric: market performance doesn’t care about speeches. Bitcoin’s price tells a more sobering story, revealing nuances that challenge the pro-Trump hype.

Strip away the promises, and the data paints a picture of volatility under Trump despite regulatory tailwinds. Biden’s term saw massive gains in key years, while Trump’s second stint has Bitcoin down nearly 5% as of late 2025. This isn’t about picking sides; it’s about understanding what actually moved the needle for investors. As we dive deeper, we’ll see how tariffs, ETFs, and family ventures shaped Bitcoin under Trump in unexpected ways.

Expectations ran high post-election, but macroeconomic shocks and leverage unraveled the bull case. Meanwhile, Biden’s tenure delivered steady institutional inflows. Here’s the breakdown, backed by numbers and events that defined each administration’s crypto footprint.

Bitcoin Performance: Numbers Don’t Lie

The raw returns offer the clearest lens on Bitcoin under Trump compared to Biden. Trump’s 2024 campaign fueled dreams of endless upside, with vows to end regulatory crackdowns and boost American crypto dominance. Yet by December 2025, Bitcoin sits nearly 5% below inauguration levels, a stark contrast to Biden’s first-year surge of 65%.

Context matters: Biden’s full term averaged strong rebounds, with 155% in 2023 and 120.7% in 2024. Trump’s first term oversaw a monumental 115x market cap expansion, dubbed the greatest bull run ever. But his return has introduced wild swings, underscoring that policy promises don’t guarantee price stability. These figures highlight how external forces often eclipse political narratives.

Analysts note Biden’s era never dipped below opening levels at its worst, while Trump’s current term flirts with annual lows—with years left to recover. This sets the stage for dissecting what drove these trajectories.

Year-by-Year Returns Breakdown

Let’s table the performance: 2021 under Biden started strong at 65%, followed by 64.2% in 2022 amid broader market turmoil. The real explosion came in 2023 with 155% gains, propelled by institutional interest, and 120.7% in 2024 as ETFs launched. Fast-forward to 2025 Bitcoin under Trump: a -5% year-to-date, punctuated by all-time highs erased by policy shocks.

Trump’s first term from 2017-2021 saw crypto market cap balloon from modest levels to trillions, a 115x multiplier. Biden delivered 4.5x overall, resilient even in bear phases. These aren’t cherry-picked; they’re aggregate returns showing Biden’s stability versus Trump’s volatility. For context, check our Bitcoin 94k spike analysis for peak moments.

Critics argue Trump’s pro-crypto stance should’ve sustained momentum, but data shows leverage and macro events dominated. November alone dropped 17.67%, per Coinglass, amplifying outflows from crypto funds.

Market Cap Multipliers Compared

Trump’s inaugural term multiplied total crypto market cap 115 times, a historic feat amid early adoption waves. Biden’s matched with steady growth, peaking in ETF-driven inflows. Under the current Bitcoin under Trump regime, cap has contracted amid liquidations exceeding $19 billion in single days.

Pseudonymous analysts highlight structural outflows starting October, blending with excessive leverage for hypersensitive markets. The Kobeissi Letter pegged $1.2 billion fund exits in early November. This mechanical downturn echoes patterns seen in our Bitcoin sell-off coverage.

Three years remain for Trump to pivot; history suggests bull runs follow corrections, but leverage risks loom large.

Bitcoin Under Trump: Volatility Reigns

January 2025 kicked off Bitcoin under Trump with promise: BTC hit $109k pre-inauguration, buoyed by SEC task force news for clearer rules. State-level reserves and institutional plays like digital asset treasuries (DATs) gained traction, mimicking MicroStrategy’s success. Yet tariffs flipped the script, tanking markets alongside stocks.

Four months of gains from April to July gave way to Fed rate cuts in September, pushing BTC to $125k in October. Projections hit $200k by year-end, riding historical Q4 strength. But policy bombshells intervened, exposing crypto’s macro entanglement. This rollercoaster defines the Trump 2.0 experience so far.

Adoption metrics shine—inflows continued—but price action decoupled from rhetoric, demanding deeper scrutiny.

Tariff Shocks and Market Crashes

EU tariffs sparked initial declines, expanded on “Liberation Day” with global 10% hikes, crushing risk assets. A 90-day pause briefly rallied markets, per trader posts, but China 100% tariffs on October 11 wiped $20 billion in leverage—the biggest since Luna. Bitcoin plunged, mirroring yen carry trade collisions we’ve tracked.

Overleveraged traders like James Wynn drew eyes, amplifying pain. Outflows hit $1.2 billion in November, per funds data. This wasn’t isolated; it cascaded into persistent stress, with BTC down 17.67% that month and more in December.

Markets proved hypersensitive, blending structural sales with mechanical liquidations. Recovery hinges on policy restraint.

Institutional Adoption Amid Chaos

Despite dips, DATs proliferated, with public firms stacking Bitcoin reserves. New Hampshire’s reserve bill became law, signaling state buy-in. Volatility dipped as institutions matured the asset, aligning with our MicroStrategy Bitcoin purchase deep dive.

Fed cuts fueled risk appetite, sustaining positives through summer. October’s ATH validated Q4 seasonality, but tariffs overshadowed. Experts see reduced vol from institutions as key to long-term health under Bitcoin under Trump.

Regulatory Shifts: ETFs and Beyond

Both administrations navigated ETFs differently, but court rulings under Biden paved the way. SEC approved spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024, Ethereum in July—post-Grayscale win. Gensler’s exit accelerated altcoin filings, with generic standards greenlit in September for SOL, HBAR, XRP, and more.

Trump’s lighter touch eased enforcement, but Biden-era approvals laid groundwork. 2024 saw $35.2 billion Bitcoin ETF inflows; 2025 slowed to $22.16 billion amid altcoin launches. This suggests capital rotation, not net growth, challenging Bitcoin under Trump narratives.

XRP ETF debuted with $58.6 million volume, Solana close behind—strong but not transformative yet.

From Bitcoin to Altcoin ETFs

Biden’s SEC dragged feet until courts forced action, approving Bitcoin then Ethereum spots. Post-Gensler, Bitwise and others flooded with altcoin apps. September’s standards slashed barriers, echoing our XRP ETFs inflows report.

Canary’s XRP ETF smashed debuts with record volume; Solana followed. Yet aggregate inflows dipped, hinting redistribution over expansion in Bitcoin under Trump era.

Inflow Trends and Capital Flows

2024’s $35 billion Bitcoin ETF haul dwarfed 2025’s pace, per SoSoValue. Altcoins drew interest but didn’t offset slowdowns. This ties to broader outflows, as detailed in our short-term Bitcoin holders analysis.

Regulatory access expanded, but performance lagged hype. Watch for sustained inflows to validate progress.

Trump Family’s Crypto Ventures

No Bitcoin under Trump story omits family plays. January meme coin launch preceded Melania’s clone; March brought Eric and Don Jr.’s Hut 8 tie-up for American Bitcoin Corp. Reuters tallies $800 million family profits from H1 2025 sales, holding billions more.

Legitimacy boost or conflict? WLFI and ventures crashed hard, sparking scrutiny. Regulators and users questioned optics, with losses hitting supporters. Ties to our meme token backlash coverage.

Wealth generation is real, but governance risks linger unprecedentedly.

Meme Coins and Corp Launches

Trump’s meme coin ignited frenzy, family ventures followed. American Bitcoin Corp aimed at mining dominance. Yet steep declines followed, wiping supporter gains amid allegations.

$1 billion reported profits contrast BTC’s 24% drop since inauguration. Questions swirl on motives.

Scrutiny and Market Impact

USD1 stablecoin ties drew regulator ire; crashes fueled backlash. Family holdings amplify influence concerns. In Bitcoin under Trump, personal stakes blur lines.

What’s Next

Defining “help” splits opinions: Trump delivered regulatory wins and product access, easing barriers under Bitcoin under Trump. Biden’s era posted superior price gains, with less drama. Volatility defines Trump’s return—tariffs and leverage overshadow adoption.

Three years remain; history favors rebounds, but macro risks persist. Watch Fed moves, tariff pauses, and ETF maturation. Crypto’s future hinges less on presidents than resilient fundamentals, as our Bitcoin in 2026 forecast explores.

Investors: focus data over dogma. Performance, not promises, endures.

Affiliate Disclosure: Some links may earn us a small commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend products we trust.

Author

Affiliate Disclosure: Some links may earn us a small commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend products we trust. Remember to always do your own research as nothing is financial advice.